- Browse Items
- Browse Collections
- Browse Exhibits
-
Podcasts
- A Campus Divided
- A Feather in Their Cap: The Story of Barry Greene (R'72)
- Can I Survive?
- Culture of Complacency
- On Campus but Not Welcomed
- Something Wrong with the System
- Spider of Color: Korean-American Representation at the University of Richmond
- Theater History at the University of Richmond
- Where I Come From, You Recognize Humanity
- Building the Web
- The Damage of the Affirmative Action Myth
- Oral Histories
- Timelines
- About the Project
- Projects That Inspire Us
- Resources
Article "Tour Of Penal Institution Reveals Much To Be Done"
Dublin Core
Title
Article "Tour Of Penal Institution Reveals Much To Be Done"
Description
Jim Winders’ article expresses significant discontent with the information he has researched in regards to the prison penal system. Winders chose to write the piece following a tour of the Virginia State Penitentiary sponsored by the Department of Psychology and reading Philip Hirschkop and M.A. Milleman’s article in the Virginia Law Review “Unconstitutionality of Prison Life”. Winders outlines the barbaric and racially segregated conditions of the state penitentiaries, discussing various prison realities like work gang segregation and “writ-writers”. “Writ-writers” are inmates who write on behalf of illiterate inmates, often in response to claims of prison abuse. Nothing positive comes from these letters however, as the Director of the Department of Welfare and Institutions, Otis L. Brown testified that he never speaks to individual prisoners and prefers to speak with superintendents in matters of prison abuse. Two “writ-writers” by the name of Robert Landman and Calvin Arey were even punished for writing letters on behalf of abused inmates to state Senator Henry Howell. Winders’ writes that this trend of punishment for speaking out is common, and Leroy Mason and Thomas Wansley faced similar punishments for speaking out against chain gang segregation. He additionally outlines a torture device known as the “Tucker Phone” which was used in Arkansas prisons which electrocutes the genitals and feet of inmates. Winder asserts that the general policy of the civil system in response to these allegations of abuse is non-intervention, although some cases like that of Weems v. The United States (1910) did seek to extend Eighth Amendment protections to prisoners.
Creator
Source
Winders, Jim. "Tour Of Penal Institution Reveals Much To Be Done." The University of Richmond Collegian LVIII, no. 12 (December 11, 1970): 2. https://collegian.richmond.edu/cgi-bin/richmond?a=d&d=COL19701211.2.12&srpos=1&e=-------en-20--1--txt-txIN-
Publisher
The Collegian, University of Richmond
Date
1970-12-11
Format
Language
English
Type
Identifier
CollegianLVIII.12.2-19701211.jpg
Coverage
Richmond (Va.)
Text Item Type Metadata
Student Contributor
Files
Citation
Winders, Jim, “Article "Tour Of Penal Institution Reveals Much To Be Done",” University of Richmond Race & Racism Project, accessed September 9, 2024, https://memory.richmond.edu/items/show/2497.